 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reversion edit
Christiaanp, care to discuss your reversion since you decided not to leave an edit summary? All of the changes made by DeMimovingdg7, as far as I can tell, were either updating current sources and information or included new sourced information but all is attributable and referenced. Can you provide a reasoned explanation for why you oppose these additions? --ARoseWolf 18:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- me no like Christiaanp (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Christiaanp, that's not a valid reason to keep something from being included, especially sourced information. There are lots of things I don't like but if it meets Wikipedia criteria for inclusion then we can't remove it without a valid reason.--ARoseWolf 19:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- my reason it, me no like. angry? go cry. hehe Christiaanp (talk) 19:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Christiaanp, I don't like some things either, but that is not a good opinion. I only revert vandalism, not really reverting good edits unless if they were reverts that have no edit summary. Wesoree (Chat with me!) 21:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- my reason it, me no like. angry? go cry. hehe Christiaanp (talk) 19:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Christiaanp, that's not a valid reason to keep something from being included, especially sourced information. There are lots of things I don't like but if it meets Wikipedia criteria for inclusion then we can't remove it without a valid reason.--ARoseWolf 19:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)