Wikipedia

Talk:Dell DRAC

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Criggie in topic "over the internet"
Learn more about this page

Generic approach

edit

We need talk of standards and a more generic discussion and name for all this stuff, to incorporate the various approaches e.g. as described at [1], including these:

IPMI (Intelligent Platform Management Interface), HP (Profile, Products, Articles) iLO (Integrated Lights Out), Dell (Profile, Products, Articles) RAC (Remote Access Card), IBM (Profile, Products, Articles) RSA (Remote Supervisor Adapter), Sun ALOM (Advanced Lights Out Manager), and both IBM’s (Profile, Products, Articles) and HP’s blade management solutions.

--NealMcB 20:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Browser compatibility

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

There's no mention of the severe restrictions on browser compatibility imposed by the various versions of the DRAC. My experience with DRAC 5 and 4 is that browser compatibility is very spotty, and that generally there are things that are broken even if you're using the preferred version of Internet Explorer on Windows. Trying to use Firefox on Linux or another architecture is very hard and generally broken.

I'm going to look for the officially DRAC browser list and add that to the article.

Dbackeberg (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


  • Officially, the claim is that Firefox on Linux is supported. There's a catch. To initially install the plugins, Firefox needs to run as root, as it needs the ability to grant the plugin permissions to make directories and copy files into the system-wide Firefox plugins directory. Alternatively, a Linux admin could grant exceptional permissions on the plugins directory. This isn't ordinarily a problem for Windows, because Windows users generally run as a very strong privileged user. Not so for linux users.

Dbackeberg (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

dell darc hardware

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

May I suggest this link as a starting point for a section about the DARC hardware http://blog.ignoranthack.me/?p=86

According with the author, who hacks a little bit the device "Dell DRAC 7 seems to be nothing more than a fancy OpenWRT instance running on a Hitachi SH4A 32bit microprocessor". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ros975 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removed patent claim

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Removed the claim of the technology being based on a specific patent as it was based on the author´s interpretation of a primary source alone, as per WP:NOTRS: "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors."

Minstrel1977 (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Pchelpcentre, The statement that a particular technology is based on a particular patent requires citation to a reliable secondary source. Otherwise it is an interpretive claim that constitutes original research. See WP:NOTRS. Also as per the Bold, revert, discuss cycle, it is strongly preferred that once edits have been reverted in good faith, editors discuss and try to achieve consensus on the relevant article talk page, not re-revert. DES (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dell DRAC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Dell DRAC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

IDRAC6, and Most Likely IDRAC7 are actually VxWorks with U-boot

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have discovered some supporting information that can easily be corroborated by anyone who can launch a hex editor. The statements by another that the IDRAC seemed to be nothing more than a modified WRT device can now be considered false.

The IDRAC 6, and most likely the IDRAC 7 are VxWorks QNX Linux with a U-Boot bootloader running on what appears to be an ARM SOC or simular inside the server. Anyone who would like to verify this, simply download the firmware image for the IDRAC 6 version 2.90, and then load the file in a hex editor and scroll down near the bottom of the file. You will find the U-boot bootloader, and a lot of the plain-text, human-readable data there in the string table clearly referencing the VxWorks bootup processes, you will find the following string that seems to shed the most light "NetBSD Linux VxWorks QNX U-Boot"

Other systems that use VxWorks are sonicwall firewalls, some Dell Powerconnect switches and Powervault units, and many NASA projects as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.124.84.19 (talk) 06:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


"over the internet"

edit
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can I suggest that part be replaced with "over an IPv4 or IPv6 based network"  ? Hanging your server's console on the internet directly is not recommended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Criggie (talk • contribs) 02:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dell_DRAC&oldid=1201436994"