Talk:Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vleon208. Peer reviewers: Joelonex, Tcvpilipina, Emily.Potter2198, Keirasullivan, Kayla.Bellan, Julian0217.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sophie007007.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2020 and 16 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kitbrooks. Peer reviewers: Teddieursa, Magicccfff.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 9 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fls098.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This page needs images of the deforestation on the ground and from the air edit

Would really add to the appreciation of the information...and seems like a basic need Avram Primack (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

A satalite image showing already deforested areas and areas being deforested now and a scale in kilometers and miles at the bottom, would help people understand this better.Provocateur (talk)
  • This article needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerjojo98 (talkcontribs) 14:10, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • A neutral point of view would indicate how much rainforest has been eliminated and at what rate and would provide photos and maps showing the deforestation.

Why doesn't the chart have information based off of the year 2019 that we are currently living in? SierraWebb (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Sierra WebbSierraWebb (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bizare edit edit

There is now a section titled "Optimistic outlook" that is a completely uncited and unsubstantiated counterargument to the idea of Amazon Rainforest deforestation. There is not only an obvious bias to the language, but the very premise has no place in this article (or on wikipedia in general), unless the author can supply good evidence that it may be true. As it stands, it appears to be nothing more than denialism. Druep (talk) 03:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

"At 2007 rates, it was considered that in two decades the Amazon Rainforest would be reduced by 40%." edit

I somehow cannot verify this using basic arithmetic and the figures given in the WP article's table (I don't have access to the source of the statement itself): In 2007, we have ~3,387,000 km² rain forest remaining, and an annual loss of 11,500 km². In two decades, you would then lose an additional 2 x 10 x 11,500 km² or 230,000 km² and end up at 3,387,000 - 230,000 km² = 3,157,000 km², which is still 77% (= 3,157,000 km² / 4,100,000 km²) of the 1970 starting area, or a 23% loss -- a far cry from the 40% loss claimed.

If the figures in the statement's source (Scott Wallace, 2007, Last of the Amazon, National Geographic magazine, 2007 issue, pp. 40-71, January 2007) are significantly different from those in the WP table, I think it's worth a mention.

What do you think, everyone?

Best, --Georgepauljohnringo (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

" It has been calculated in 2006 that McDonald's ... " edit

" ... and its suppliers were then responsible for 70,000 km² of the Amazon's deforestation in the preceding three years." -- according to the WP table, the total Amazon deforestation for 2003, 2004 and 2005 was just over 70,000 km²; which would mean that McD and Co were responsible for the entire Amazon deforestation in these three years. This seems worthy of verification to me, does someone have access to the original Greenpeace source? They might have a larger overall figure for deforestation, which puts the statement in perspective and should be added to the WP article, in my opinion.

Thanks for your help! --Georgepauljohnringo (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

This abuse of the McDonald's was a famous troll in the relative early years of the Internet as forum use grew. If there is any listing of the people who have had an hand in the destruction of Amazonia or in any other impact related environment, a source to these places should be pointed out.

82.5.153.175 (talk) 01:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC) WeatherlawyerReply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Page views edit

Leo1pard (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Tone issues edit

@Cbrittain10: I don't understand this cleanup tag: how can this article's tone or style be improved? Jarble (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply