Talk:Defence of the Realm Act 1914

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

2009 discussion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The statement that the Act introduced a "variety of authoritarian social control mechanisms" is unduly emotive and POV.124.197.15.138 (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, how is describing something which is authoritarian as authoritarian an "emotive" and "POV"? Maybe the Queen doesn't think it's so authoritarian, but that's her extremely biased POV which is not shared by many, but possibly by you. Ipunchouthorses (talk) 03:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

eiiiiiiiiiiiiiierguwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww9grwpujgoJOgjgdsiEEIOfIEIKPQODJK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.179.203.204 (talk) 09:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic