Talk:Defence Review
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
The Mason Review
editAny reason why the 1974-75 Mason Review is not covered here? [1] Thom2002 (talk) 20:35, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
This article should be moved
editThis article should be at United Kingdom defence reviews or similar title. The UK is not the only country that does defence reviews. Defence Review should be an article about the concept itself, not only one individual country's implementation of it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- See South African Defence Review 2012 - other countries do it too! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:07, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Defence Review → United Kingdom defence reviews – The UK is not the only country that does "Defence Reviews". The current title should contain an article that discusses the concept of Defence/Defense Reviews as such in the broad sense - not only one particular country's implementation of the concept. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 10:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- support per nom. A disambiguation page or set index should be at this location. The USDOD has the QDR for example. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 04:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support either disambig page in this place, or a page that discusses defence reviews in general. Stickee (talk) 07:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:DIFFCAPS, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and probably more. There's no need to pre-emptively disambiguate this. An article on reviewing defenses in general would be located at, say, Defense review or Defence review. Red Slash 01:12, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose If this is an issue then a page Defense review (disambiguation) or Defence review (disambiguation) should first be developed. Then, on this basis, editors might have some clue as to what they were dealing with here. If then a move seemed warranted I'd suggest a name starting "Defence review..." and continuing with location name. Gregkaye ✍♪ 13:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Should we have articles for the NSCR and the MDP?
editNational Security Capability Review - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-capability-review-nscr
Modernising Defence Programme - https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-01-25/debates/002ED98B-7B42-424B-8213-7EC5650664BC/ModernisingDefenceProgramme