Talk:Deepak Singh (politician)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Merger proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was not to merge draft as it seems copyvio of this webpage #1997kB 10:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I propose that Draft:Deepak Singh be merged into Deepak Singh (politician). I think that the content in the Draft:Deepak Singh article can easily be explained in the context of Deepak Singh (politician), and the Deepak Singh (politician) article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Draft:Deepak Singh will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. #1997kB 04:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Seems sensible and reasonable to me. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support please ensure that the other concert listed at the draft have been addressed. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 17:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC).
- Support, however you need to ensure that content issues are fixed beforehand, and it may be easier to just rewrite the content in the draft from scratch. TheDragonFire (talk) 05:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- As a procedural/admin note, I can confirm that the page was a WP:G12 violation and has been speedy deleted. Primefac (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)