Talk:DeepPeep

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Neateditor123 in topic Subjective section...

Untitled edit

Admin note: Article was restored per editor's request. A {{hangon}} tag was placed on behalf of the editor to give him some time to work on it. -- Alexf(talk) 19:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I have made an addition or two, hopefully enough for now to at least avoid another speedy. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Site is down — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.67.8.51 (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Site Is Gone edit

As of 2012 (probably a for a year or so now), the website appears to be dead, domain and all. It appears to be thoroughly dead. LiamSP (talk) 02:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

you should have been there. The room was dimly lit due to a thunderstorm taking out a nearby power line. They decided to close it behind closed doors. Some lecturers recommended it stay up or the tech sold on. But it never was. What a shame. Only 8 people were in the room during that decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.231.142 (talk) 13:10, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The site went too deep and fell into the deep web itself. That's what happens when you stand on the precipice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.228.184 (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DeepPeep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:50, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on DeepPeep. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Subjective section... edit

As you may have noticed, I removed the section of this article titled "Advantages". That's because the entire thing contains extremely subjective materials, which aren't acceptable on Wikipedia. Perhaps a rewording of the section and/or title change could help. You let me know.--Neateditor123 (talk) 17:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)Neateditor123Reply