I naturally don't agree that my submission Decorative mirrors is "entirely inappropriate" as Joel suggests, but yes, it could probably be moved to a section in Mirrors. Reason for the submission is that the Mirrors article did not cover this issue and was far too concerned with the science of mirrors rather than their everyday use. Napier Andrews (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't say the subject is inappropriate, just the tone. For example, "A mirror may be the most ubiquitous device in the modern interior designer's repertoire". This is not encyclopedic. Same goes for all of the interior design advice. If you have information (with sources) for the history of decorative mirrors, etc, that may be appropriate.JoelWhy (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC)