WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 13 October 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. If Sikhism's and Hinduism's Daya are not related, there is nothing to merge. (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 09:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply



– We currently have two articles based on the Sanskrit for "compassion", one for Sikhs, one for Hindus - this is really the same thing, but while we have two articles the base word should be a dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 05:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. Daya in Sikhism isn't the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term Daya.[1]--Cúchullain t/c 14:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose where is the article for "Daya" in Hinduism? The correct approach would be to merge that content to the current article about Sikhism. SSTflyer 10:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Daya (Hinduism) is not part of Daya (Sikhism). There doesn't have to be a standalone article, please see WP:Disambiguation. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
this is really the same thing if so, WP:CFORKs should not exist. SSTflyer 03:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Is it? Please look at our religion articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
More to the point, there are a number of other articles called "Daya", and this one isn't the most prominent among them.--Cúchullain t/c 13:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Gorthian, did you mean support then?Cúchullain t/c 00:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oops, yes. Fixed. Thanks, Cúchullain! — Gorthian (talk) 01:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.