Talk:Day One (Torchwood)/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by JuneGloom07 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JuneGloom Talk 21:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good evening/afternoon/morning! I'll review this article momentarily. - JuneGloom Talk 21:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I took care of a couple of typos and a repetition.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No dead links and the sources look okay to me. I can't see any evidence of original research.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    The article is stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The images are good, one fair use with a proper rationale and one free one respectively.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Just one thing and nothing to really stop me from passing the article, but at the end of the first paragraph in Filming it says; "However, the sequence had to be shot again twelve days later." Was a reason given for this?