Talk:David Werdyger

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 70.161.8.90 in topic Soprano

Edit 12 Feb 2011

edit

If Werdyger "operated a well known travel agency", (past tense). then he is a "retired entrepreneur" as described more than adequately in the first sentence. Stating "he is now no longer active", in whatever he was active in, is gobbledegook unless what he was active in is described, is notable, and is referenced - see: Wikipedia:Verifiability. Words like "well known" (should be well-known) are weasely and not encyclopedic, unless backed-up with reliable independent third party inline citations to sources that quote such. Do not add-back such unsubstantiated comments that smack of editorializing (Wikipedia:Editorializing), and could violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. If there are no independent sources for claims, this would be considered as violating Wikipedia's strictures on original research, see:Wikipedia:No original research. Acabashi (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Werdyger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Soprano

edit

The ref does say soprano (alto) but since he's a male how likely is this to be true? Also, how did this make DYK as it is not new and was not significantly expanded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.161.8.90 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply