Revisions to the history of David Lochhead, UCHUG and Ecunet edit

In the month of March there have been three revisions which have altered dramatically the inclusion of the history of David Lochhead. 1. the article on David Lochhead has been severely reduced to a stub, which has eliminated most of the reason for the inclusion of his history at all. The stub is not complete and would require the recreation of his history. 2. the Article ECUNET has been eliminated entirely. There is not even a talk page so I have no place to make an argument for its non-deletion. David Lochhead was the main force behind the creation of Ecunet and was its first President.

3 The article UCHUG has also been deleted. Even the talk page has been eliminated. David Lochhead was the inspiration for the creation of UCHUG.

All these changes were made this March, 2010, which month is not yet over.

I believe these three changes have been made with insufficient time for valid objections or for opposing views. Gordon Laird (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:David Lochhead/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

A great deal of this article as it stands reads as a personal essay. Needs improvement. TrickyApron (talk) 04:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC) The article which was recently in place for David Lochhead was much more extensive than what appears here. There was a long discussion about the worthiness of the original article, and it was settled as being worthy. I don't understand what kind of intervention has produced this much shortened and inadequate article. Can anyone enlighten me? Gordon Laird (talk) 06:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 06:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 12:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)