This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
JasonWeitz (talk·contribs) has been paid by Left Mind Media on behalf of David Latimer. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Declaration
Suspicious page creation using twice AfC rejected draft by potential sockedit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I noticed that @JasonWeitz, who has disclosed that they were paid to create an article on David Latimer, created a draft Draft:David_Latimer that was twice rejected in AfC review. A few weeks later, a new SPA editor @Nutchladsa bypasses the AfC process and creates this page David_Latimer using more or less the rejected draft from @JasonWeitz. This is quite suspicious and may be worth an SPI. AncientWalrus (talk) 12:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
