Talk:David Boje
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Tag
editI placed the tag on this page as the main contributor is the subject. BLP policy is clear, on your own article you should confine yourself to correcting mistakes. --Snowded TALK 19:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
--
THis is ridiculous
Of course the page is about me. It is titled David Boje
What would you do if I went to the Snowden page and said delete it because it is autobriographical
Signed,
David Boje — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboje (talk • contribs) 20:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- David, BLP policy says that you should NOT edit your own article, that is what the tag referenced. The Snowden page has not been edited by me other than an odd factual correction and vandalism removal. It was written by other editors. Get the point now?--Snowded TALK 20:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK despite the silliness of the section below I have done same basic work to wikify this. Its worth noting that there are no third party citations and as it stands the article could be subject to deletion on grounds of notability. Policy says that without one reliable third party source it is subject to deletion. I think it qualifies as notable per criteria 1 of [[WP::Notability_(academics)| this policy]] but that has to be demonstrated by reliable third party sources. --Snowded TALK 21:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I am being harassed by Dave Snowden
editWherever I go in Wikipedia, even in the David Boje page, I am pursued by Dave Snowden.
This is what happened to the once quite useful antenarrative page, now gone.
This is the history of the deletion of the Antenarrative page.
• 2:44, 1 March 2011 Ponyo (talk | contribs) deleted "Antenarrative" (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion)
• 01:49, 5 February 2011 Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) deleted "Antenarrative" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antenarrative (2nd nomination))
• 20:58, 29 December 2005 Howcheng (talk | contribs) deleted "Antenarrative" (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antenarrative)
• A story concept being promoted by its inventor, Dboje (talk • contribs).Unsurprisingly most of the incoming links were added by Dboje: storytelling, story arc and Fabula and syuzhet. And the addition to Barbara Czarniawska was added by a sock puppet (but I hasten to say that I saw no evidence that it was a sock puppet of Dboje). Has anything changed since the AfD five years ago? — RHaworth (talk • contribs) 23:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)}}
• * Delete. As noted, this is part of a walled garden of articles by
User:Dboje about theories he himself has originated, with "references" that
don't make it clear if any part of these theories is accepted by others, and
the article itself is well-fortified with gibberish and evasion rather than
a description of the thing named. Even assuming notability of this concept
could be clearly shown, the article would need a complete rewrite, so the
present text is superfluous in any case. — Gavia immer (talk) 02:22, 29
January 2011 (UTC)
• * Delete per nomination, without third party evidence of use/adoption and some balancing criticism this reads like a promotional piece; other related articles look to be extracts from Boje. Full disclosure, I know of Boje's work and am involved in the field of organisational narrative. --Snowded TALK 07:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• Should this article be moved to wikiversity?Harrypotter (talk) 08:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related
deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC) • * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC) • * Delete - Agree with Snowded. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboje (talk • contribs)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Boje. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100702192431/http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/nf/index.htm to http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/nf/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)