Talk:Datsik (musician)
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
editThis article and its deletion discussion were brought to my attention; however, I did not delete the article via CSD G4 because this new version is not identical to the previous one. Also, upon doing some investigation, I see that The Province calls him "one of the most popular dubstep DJs around", he gets a little bit of coverage in Eye Weekly, [1] [2], and even some brief coverage in the Liverpool Echo, so I would think, with the coverage in Spinner.com as well, it may pass the bar of general notability. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 16:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
This was cause for deletion? Whats the point of having an encyclopedia if you delete something that you dont deem as "well known" and "notable"? The point is to have a database of info, not a collection of "hot topics". Also, Im editing this article by way of removing putting a tracklist for an album in the general info, and, you know, giving the album its own entry? 98.202.175.139 (talk) 17:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Here is a mainstream press article Datsik - the tipping point for dubstep has been reached from The Independent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigriscuniculus (talk • contribs) 11:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Datsik Debut Album
editAs cause for necessity, I removed the tracklist that was simply just posted on the artist page and have created a page for the album itself, and will fix and add links to this page once/if the page gets approved. If anyone feels upset that the tracklist was removed, or if the page doesnt get approved, Ill save the tracklist here for other editors convenience.
- Annihilate
- Fully Blown feat. Snak the Ripper
- Syndrome (with Downlink)
- Bonafide Hustler
- Evilution (with Infected Mushroom) feat. Jonathan Davis
- Need You
- Don't Feel Right
- Light the Fuse
- Complete Control
- Punisher (with Downlink)
- Napalm feat. Messinian
- Double Trouble (with Z-Trip) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babyyyy (talk • contribs) 17:35, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
"Dubstep" vs. "Brostep"
editI changed the genre listing in two places from "brostep" to "dubstep." "Brostep" has more of a negative connotation, not to mention the term's informal nature. I would personally avoid using the term in any context other than general conversation. 99.181.49.152 (talk) 15:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
"the methods he uses to create his sounds is often the source of great debate"
editThe 3rd sentence contains this phrase, which is confusing. Is it saying that people don't know how he makes his sounds, or that they are upset by how he makes his sounds? Regardless, if there really is "great debate" there should be at least one source referenced. Wickedjacob (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Datsik discography
editSupport split - Discography section takes up more than one third of the page and should be split to a new article entitled Datsik discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 04:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2018
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To resolve the no references issue in the Firepower Records section, please add the source from the lead as well as these additional two sources to the second paragraph. [3] [4] 2601:589:8000:2ED0:A4A2:59DA:B465:F20D (talk) 19:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Partly done: Not all of the section's content is verified in the articles, but I have cited them where possible. I have not cited the article by The Collegiate because it is a student publication; these are generally not reliable outside of matters pertaining to the institutions they write for and about. Given that the section now contains at least one reference, I have also changed the unreferenced tag to a refimprove tag. LifeofTau 02:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)