This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Data (Star Trek) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
aspect ratio of picture
editIs anyone else seeing the image of Data stretched vertically? --Rebroad (talk) 04:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Better sources needed
editWhile the article clearly needs better sourcing I'm not sure the recent deletes are the best way to improve things.[1] Anyone interested in improving the article later might want to go back and revisit older versions of the article, as there didn't seem to be anything anything factually wrong from my skim reading just a lot of poorly sourced information relying too heavily on primary sources. -- 109.76.192.106 (talk) 03:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
"Data(Star Trek)" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Data(Star Trek) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 8 § Data(Star Trek) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
The Next Generation absence
editFamily Goojrr (talk) 05:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Spot
editThis seems to be a bit more than trivia. Spot is actually a "recurring character", maybe that section could be added to List of Star Trek: The Next Generation characters Thoughts? - FlightTime (open channel) 15:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
I reinstated the section per Talk:Data_(Star_Trek)/Archive_1#Merge_Spot_into_this_article. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Spot is not a character, it's just a pet. A plot device at best, a background prop at worst. Not only it does not deserve a standalone article (the thing discussed in the archive, almost 20 years ago), even a section in someone else's article is still too big. Cambalachero (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree totally. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)