Talk:Dassault Mirage 2000N/2000D

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Wfoj3 in topic 2000N versus 2000D

Upgrades

edit

"It is being developed by Thales for service introduction in 2006."

As we are now in 2013 (at the time of writing) this comment is now obsolete and I believe it requires amendment. Dawright12 (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Image required

edit

Does anybody know of a public domain/free-to-use photo of the 2000N that could be used on this page? It just doesn't look right without a photo. --Tomwalden 14:51, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)

File:Mirage 2000N EC3-4.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Mirage 2000N EC3-4.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mirage 2000N EC3-4.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dassault Mirage 2000N/2000D. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

2000N versus 2000D

edit

I would suggest the article be split - separate articles for each aircraft. I have several reasons - First the 2000N was only designed capable for a single weapon. (I could be wrong). Secondly I believe the 2000 N is about to be retired by the French. Next consider the nature of the weapon it was designed for. Other National have their aircraft able to swing between the 2 different roles. Wfoj3 (talk) 22:31, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply