Talk:Dariusz Stola

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nihil novi in topic What is it?

13 June 2016‎ edit

his article should be rejected. He isn`t notable historian in Poland. Lack of presigious publications... any notable international achievements, awards, honours, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.47.69.61 (talkcontribs) 17:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dariusz Stola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nice, but maybe we should discuss deletion of this article about this historian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.47.76.48 (talk) 19:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

What is it? edit

Stola remarked that Communism in Poland could have existed without the Jews, but it would not have if the Poles had not taken part in it - Stola has remarked thousands of things in his life, why this one is quoted?Xx236 (talk) 06:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Considering this article is a short stub - two short paragraphs of prose spanning some 7 lines on my screen total - we should be looking for content to add, not to redact.Icewhiz (talk) 07:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
You are free to write a serious biography but the quote isn't serious.Xx236 (talk) 08:15, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I agree. It is an odd thing to include in the context.
Nihil novi (talk) 08:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply