This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Daria Khaltourina' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles
Maintenance / Etc
Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes.
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
A fact from Daria Khaltourina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 February 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that according to Russian sociologist Daria Khaltourina(pictured), Protestantism influenced positively the capitalist development of social systems through the promotion of literacy and Bible reading?
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Peace Print and Protestantism 1450 1558 by CSL Davies Fontan 1995,; already rehearsed and proposed these arguments in relation to literacy and trade. No reason that a current Russian academic would not know of this 85.210.0.29 (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I don't think that there is enough evidence that this person is reputable, and the information does not sound impartial either. The whole highly praising tone of the article is fitting for a resume rather than objective information in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not the place to advertize yourself (hint: your own website, linkedin, etc). Completely shameless. 87.64.58.250 (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree.. delete this,. the objectivity of Wikipedia has reached an alltime low. And it wasn't a high standard to begin with — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.244.60 (talk) 12:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Either edit the article to fix the problem, or propose it for deletion. Do not persistently blank the page; you will be blocked. Yunshui雲水 12:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
