 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024
edit | This edit request to Daniyal Chaudhary has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
World No 1 strategist (talk) 23:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
theres false information linked throug some wrong articles that needs to be removed.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. RudolfRed (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Form 47
editThe mention of form 47 is a false information regarding a government National Assembly candidate its done by a opposition party article writer named saqib,plus danyal Chaudhary has been set free from thd case as court didn’t find any evidence. please fix this 154.192.30.70 (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
False information
edithow can you references articles which are older then 5 months … please remove “ 47 mention and ch adnan case false information as i can provide the lastest information 154.192.30.70 (talk) 01:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- 154.192.30.70, I've removed vandalism. — Saqib (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- You are biased and you are supporting to Mr. Daniyal that actually did not win the election based on form 45. We must maintain integrity when writing about living person Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Provide proof of form 45 otherwise it shows either you are close relative of Mr. Daniyal or you are impersonating Chrisbroad34 (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth and Wikipedia:No original research. — Saqib (talk | contribs) 20:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: Regarding this: DAWN states In a surprise move...
and that ...is being considered a surprise move by ...
. Maybe we need to reword it neutral? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- My view is that unless you phrase that as a quote or paraphrase in-text attributed to DAWN, it still doesn't fit wiki-voice, it's newspaper-language. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gråbergs Gråa Sång, Can you please convert it into a quote, because IMO it is an important aspect. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- [1] acceptable? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gråbergs Gråa Sång, Perfect. Thanks! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- [1] acceptable? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Gråbergs Gråa Sång, Can you please convert it into a quote, because IMO it is an important aspect. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
False information
editWhat proof do you want when someone is in the government,ask the government and that’s enough proof, “ Old news articles being cited by saqib , this fellow is truly unprofessional and a political supporter not professional. Wikipedia is losing its worth and saqib you cults like will be exposed soon. Unprofessional writers should be exposed 2407:D000:8:979F:A8D7:F929:BF53:3044 (talk) 01:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)