Talk:Dante Tiñga
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to Philippines edit
I noticed there is no wikilink to the actual Philippines article. I tried to figure out where to put one, but there's no obvious spot. Anyone have any ideas? Tan ǀ 39 02:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Controversy edit
I added controversy, with the full text of the Per Curiam S. C. decision to balance the very short article, since, bios of justices must contain sections of controversies if supported by verifiable sources. The mere fact that the Justice was cleared, still, the fact remains that he was accused by the lawyer of bribery. Hence, it remains a controversy which must be added to make the bio neutral and not just one-sided.--Florentino floro (talk) 07:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- This so-called controversy does not balance the article, quite the contrary, it un-balances it. Precisely because the article is short, inclusion makes this contrtoversy seem like the most important event in his life. It is surely not the case. There is also no context given about whether or not we should think the charges were justified. This is a clear violation of BLP. He was cleared of the charges. To improve this short article, notable events in his life could be included, other positions he has held. But shortness is not an excuse to for muckraking. xschm (talk) 22:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dante Tiñga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224140650/http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2005/apr2005/118127.htm to http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2005/apr2005/118127.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)