Talk:Dansby Swanson/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Cherrell410 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 00:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


First Thoughts

edit

Just glancing throughout the article, it looks like the article is well-sourced and has lots of information, including statistics, dates, and pictures. I'm already thinking that it will be a successful article.

Immediate failures

edit

Passes all immediate failure criteria, making it further reviewable.

Criteria

edit

I took all of the criteria listed from Wikipedia:Good article criteria.

Well Written

edit
  • The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience.
  • Spelling and grammar are correct, and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

Verifiable with no original research

edit
  • Contains a list of all references
  • All inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons.
  • It contains no original research.
  • It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

Broad in its coverage

edit
  • It addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  • It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

Neutral

edit
  • It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable

edit
  • It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated

edit
  • Media is tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
  • Media is relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Final Thoughts

edit

I truly and deeply feel that this article meets all criteria and good article expectations, and deserves to be a good article.