Talk:Danny Tanner

Sourcing

Hey, just to let you know I will be scouring all the mentions of the books in characters' sections. The books are quite technically fanfic and are like relying on a fanfiction.net story to explain why a character does this or does that. -John

Birthdate

Danny Tanner's birthdate was listed as being August 13, 1968. This makes no sense because it would mean he is 19 when the show starts, but he has a 10 year old daughter. There was even a flashback to February 23, 1968 where Danny and Joey were approximately 11. Danny turned 30 during the 1987-88 season. I changed the birthdate to August 13, 1958. I don't know where the August 13 figure came from but I didn't want to delete something unless I was fairly certain it was incorrect. Q0 12:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Death of the Twins

I think that someone should address the death of the twins. I mean figure their strange death in a clown show at the end of the last show something worth talking about.

Nothing like that happened in the show. Q0 01:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I remember that, someone should add it.

They didn't die..(Rubyandme)

Recurring vandalism

Someone keeps vandalizing this page using different sockpuppet accounts and IP addresses; stuff about alcoholism and such, along with blatant and purposeful factual errors. The same information was added along with stuff like "Cornhole Tanner" a while ago.

There's also empty categories being readded after CFD.

The edit history is being cluttered. I'm going to keep reverting it since it's blatant vandalism; just wanted everyone who might be watching this page to know. Voretus^talk 22:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Voretus, please stop reverting my edits, as they are not vandalism. 23:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Despite what you may feel, the episode that the "vandal" named is in deed an episode that deals with alcohol and alcoholism. In fact, the vandal's statement about Danny's past is correct. However, clearly "Cornhole Tanner" is factually incorrect. It looks like all the vandalism has been taken care of up to this point.UP2HHH 00:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I feel inclined not to believe you, as your two most recent edits involved replacing a picture of John Stamos with a picture of an orangutan.

Vicki did not take a meatpacking job. She took an anchorwoman job. "Just Say No Way" involved Jesse misunderstanding a situation and thinking that DJ was drinking; it was not about Danny. Voretus^talk 20:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, Vicky did take a meatpacking job. This because her anchorwoman job reminded her of Danny too much. Also, while you are correct about the overall plot in "Just Say No Way" you are clearly wrong about Danny's alcohol "problems." They are mentioned in the show, so I will revert your last edit. You should watch some of the early episodes (especially season 1), as the alcohol problems are mentioned more in season 1. When you are finished watching, let me know.WRE451 01:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I've seen most of the episodes several times, and I don't remember anything being mentioned about Danny having a drinking problem or Vicky taking a job meatpacking.

WAVY 10 22:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Me neither. I've never heard of the meatpacking; I'm quite sure it was anchorwoman. And "Just Say No Way" was definitely with DJ, though Danny might have had one (I don't remember) Mooski Magnus 02:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

The sockpuppets are at it again, but it has been corrected. WAVY 10 14:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Did Danny have an alcohol problem?

Now this page has gone through an edit war. What gives? (Wait, it's a page related to Full House and/or Bob Saget; which automatically makes it a sitting duck for vandals?) 208.27.124.228 00:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

And the edit war has begun afresh. WAVY 10 15:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

There is no justification for the removal of my posts, THEY ARE ACCURATE! Watch the first season again and you will see. WRE451 16:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Still, you didn't need to remove the reference to the last appearance being Michelle Rides Again, because that would imply the show is still in production, which hasn't been the case since '95. 67.76.100.155 20:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

WRE451, I accept your challenge. Just let me know on my talk page when Season 1 is re-airing again (either on ABC Family or Nick at Nite, I'll check it out to verify the claim. But I am still going to add the last episode section. WAVY 10 22:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Season 1 started running again on ABC Family yesterday and so far, nothing confirming Danny had alcohol issues. WAVY 10 21:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Voretus Vandalism

Is there anything we can do about the continuous vandalism committed by Voretus? He continuously reverts without discussing his changes in the talk page first. Voretus is in clear violation of the 3RR. Is there anything we can do? --ProteinTotal 22:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I just requested semi-protection of this page...again! WAVY 10 22:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I have talked to both ProteinTotal and Voretus in an attempt to stop the revert war. Both parties are subject to the 3RR rule, since the edits done count as vandalism. Hopefully we can get them to discuss changes before, reverting. --Alabama Man 07:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Requesting Protection

The vandalism problem on this page has gotten a LOT worse. I looked at the history for today and this page has been getting vandalized with all sorts of crazy claims.

This is it! I am officially going to request protection for this article because of the repeated vandalism.

WAVY 10 17:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Rasslin'

Should there be some mention about Danny being a wrestler in high school? This was brought up at least a couple of times (including one where he mentions his nickname as the "String Bean of Steel")? WAVY 10 17:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DannyTannerBobSaget.png

Image:DannyTannerBobSaget.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)