Talk:Danni Quee

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Star Wars

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Expanded Universe.

Reasons for Removing Deletion Request edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have removed the request for deletion from this page because I believe the article is of sufficient importance to the Star Wars expanded universe. Danni Quee was an important factor in the NJO books, and should therefore be removed from the deletion list. Inigo1 (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi Inigo1, whats needed as WP:N says is references to "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." it would be good if you can dig some of those up and add them to the article in question. cheers Mission Fleg (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic