This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
I just did a thorough edit, adding sourcing and noting a few places where citations were still needed (some association memberships, principally). From what I see in revision page, Andcentra had just added selected publications, which are all sourced, and some categories (living people, immunologist). The tone reads as neutral to me. Taylor (talk) 14:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nbauman: Honestly, I don't know what kind of answer you're looking for. I pointed to the exact paid disclosure by Andcentra, added by Andcentra. So let me ask you, how is that not an admission? MarioGom (talk) 08:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
When I press Control+F, and search "paid by Daniel O. Griffin", I get
Andcentra (talk · contribs) has been paid by Daniel O. Griffin on their behalf.
That's in Wikipedia's voice, not in Andcentra's voice. That's not an admission. Where has Andcentra admitted in his/her own voice that he/she was paid by Griffin? --Nbauman (talk) 22:04, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but there is nothing on Andcentra's talk page to indicate that it was Andcentra who added that template, rather than an admin. The template addition has no signature.
I'm not concerned about the individual edit, but I'm trying to figure out the Wikipedia process for handling accusations of violating rules in general. I don't see any audit trail for this particular decision. If you can easily point it out with a link, go ahead, but I'm ready to give up on this. --Nbauman (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nbauman: Here's the link to the exact edit where Andcentra added the disclosure: Special:Diff/1073043539. Wikipedia tracks every change to every page, including the author of changes and time. If you follow the link, you will see that Andcentra added a disclosure (in the source: {{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Andcentra|U1-employer=Daniel O. Griffin|U1-client= Daniel O. Griffin}}) to their own talk page, with timestamp 18:54, 20 February 2022. MarioGom (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
To add some more context: paid editing might seem unusual for pages on academics. It actually isn't. There's at least one company who spams University emails to offer creating a biography on Wikipedia, as documented on Wikipedia:List of paid editing companies § Index of Sciences LTD. There are also more generalist spam companies creating biographies for academics, as part of a wider clientele. MarioGom (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply