Talk:Daniel Menche

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2601:18E:8201:7B50:31CC:184C:9ADB:607F in topic Seriously written as a bio with barely any sources–have an editor look at it

Description edit

"whose work could best be described as belonging to no genre that exists"
This is by far the worst description I've ever seen, especially since it's already placed in the noise genre. Removing it. --Redoubts (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Deletion edit

I have removed the proposed deletion, as the article adheres to WP:MUSIC. Cnwb (talk) 09:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniel Menche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Seriously written as a bio with barely any sources–have an editor look at it edit

This entry seems like a self-listed bio with barely any sources...I have been told that a person's website is not a source when attempting to make other Wiki's (like Peter Gena's) and yet so many of them include them, in this case, basically exclusively...the whole thing seems like somewhat "objective" writing without any sources 2601:18E:8201:7B50:31CC:184C:9ADB:607F (talk) 15:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply