This article was nominated for deletion on 11 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I do admit I'm somewhat of a newbie as far as actually editing content on Wikipedia, but I'm familiar enough with the site to know that this page was a mess. I did these edits in keeping with Wikipedia's "Good Faith" standard and tagged it with a "Clean-Up" banner in hopes that someone 1) more experienced with Wikipedia and 2) more knowledgeable about Mr. Letterle can contribute. That said, I feel the sub-par quality of this page as I found it, a complete lack of source citation (especially in regard to the "Trivia" section) and the choice to boldface the entry om its entirety (assuming it wasn't a typo by a newbie Wiki user) leads me to the personal conclusion that this is a Vanity Article written by Letterle or a party close to him (agent, PR rep, etc.). Just my opinion, which is why I took the issue here. FuturePresent 19:50, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
I've added plentiful reference citations, but would love to see the number of reliable sources continue to be increased in the article. --Willscrlt (Talk) 16:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
