Talk:Danie Mellor/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This article meets the GA criteria in my opinion.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I fixed a few things.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Everything's cited, assuming accurate.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Looks good.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image, no problem.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Pass, good work. —Noisalt (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Featured Article?

Why the heck was this article used as a featured article? It's about an artist and it only has one very small low quality image at the bottom of the page. Just curious. I thought the standards for featured articles were much higher... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdaw (talk • contribs) 00:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)