Talk:Danggali, South Australia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cowdy001 in topic External links modified
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Danggali, South Australia be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in South Australia may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Danggali, South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/7018/Rack_Plan_951_Map.pdf. - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150923004420/http://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/23484/Land_Not_Within_a_Council_Area_Eyre_Far_North_Riverland_and_Whyalla_Development_Plan.pdf to http://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/23484/Land_Not_Within_a_Council_Area_Eyre_Far_North_Riverland_and_Whyalla_Development_Plan.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- Revert one change because the link still works and marked the other as 'failed' after upgrading the link. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 01:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)