Talk:Dance-pop/Archive 1

Archive 1

All Music Guide reference

[1] I removed it because it is very short, and still so full of weasel-words and POV. And it credits neither any author nor sources/references. -- Chsf 10:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Usher, Enrique Iglesias, Kat Deluna and Shakira are NOT specifically dance-pop artists

Please cite references if they ARE! (Mirror Ball 13:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC))

Jennifer Lopez is dance-pop she has had many dance hits!

Please cite references before adding her to the list.

Removed Lisa Lisa & Cult Jam and Kate Ryan from the "Notable Dance-pop Artists" section

Lisa Lisa and Cult Jam were more freestyle than outright dance-pop -- except for "Let the Beat Hit 'Em". And Kate Ryan (though she may have had a dance-pop song or two) isn't noteworthy ENOUGH as a dance-pop artist. Please cite references before adding to this list.

Thank you. (Mirror Ball 05:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC))

Belanova is not a NOTABLE dance-pop artist or group

Removed them. They aren't notable in the sense that they won awards, redefined the genre, etc. Also -- please don't add artists unalphabetically as you added belanova. (Mirror Ball 21:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC))

Redundant

The term is redundant and incredibly vague-Binary TSO ^???

Another style of music created by allmusic.com editors

As checking references for this article revealed - 3/5 of them are allmusic.com references, 1/5 is not allmusic but only has a mention of "dance-pop" in text. I have already pointed to probable unacceptability of allmusic.com as the source of information related to music genres. There are some other citations that can be found via Google/Google.Books, all having "dance pop"/"dance-pop" words in text. But I'm almost sure, after checking those citations, that no article can be written on the base of them.

So I'm starting the discussion on whether this article should be deleted.

I also would like to propose all articles on music genres having exclusively allmusic.com references as a source to be deleted. -- Appletangerine un (talk) 12:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I'd rather make an audacious assumption that "dance pop" could also be a synonimous descriptor for some other well-described in appropriate sources music genre. -- Appletangerine un (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

This seems to be quite an important debate. Where did you point to this please?--SabreBD (talk) 15:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

CfD

ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Merge Proposal

Disagree with proposal to merge this article with Disco. Given the discussion on the deletion proposal here, that type of merge would make the whole genre-definition mess even worse. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 03:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Accusation of vandalism

Hello, I saw your message on my talk page. I don't believe I vandalized the page. I removed information that wasn't cited, which is what you are supposed to do, especially for an article that is supposed to be a Good article. I was following the rules of WP:OR and WP:RS. If I'm mistaken, please take it to the discussion already in progress on the talk page for the song's article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dance-pop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130706020653/http://www.timeout.jp/en/tokyo/feature/6090/Live-report-Summer-Sonic-2012 to http://www.timeout.jp/en/tokyo/feature/6090/Live-report-Summer-Sonic-2012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)