Talk:Dan Pearson (garden designer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 82.71.0.229 in topic Tagged for copy-editing
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dan Pearson (garden designer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tagged for copy-editing

edit

Quick note to say that I tagged this for copy-editing - something I don't have time to do myself. I think the style needs tightening up in places and there are a few sentences that could do with an editorial rethink. For example, "He had a weekend gardening job for Mrs. Pumphrey" (who is Mrs Pumphrey?); the one about Dan Pearson's partner ("According to a radio broadcast interview with Kirsty Young on BBC Radio 4's Desert Island Discs, Dan Pearson has a partner called Huw, whom he has known since the 1990s.") reads (IMHO) a bit like prurient gossip, rather than encyclopedic fact (objectively documented: http://digdelve.com/about/). More broadly, I'm not sure Dan Pearson's importance quite comes across from this article as it stands: he is a world-class garden designer (with an international reputation), but the text as it stands doesn't really reflect that ("He had a weekend gardening job for Mrs. Pumphrey"). Just a few hopefully constructive suggestions that I hope future editors will be able to pick up and sort out. Thanks! 82.71.0.229 (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply