Talk:Dan McTeague

Latest comment: 3 months ago by D a keldsen in topic Pro-life views

Untitled edit

This line appears midway through the article...

"Some critics, nevertheless, believe that this position panders to homophobia in parts of the electorate."

I believe this statement should be removed, not because a citation is needed to verify its source, but because it is a biased and unfounded statement regarding oposition to gay marriage.

- mav-tgif, 04.07.06

Pro-life views edit

"He is also known to have a pro-life stance on abortion issues." - Does anyone have a source for this?

His election literature in 2004 noted he was the only pro-life candidate running in Pickering-Scarborough East, but I no longer have a copy of that. - I'll see what else I can dig up. 22:08, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Source material can be found here: [1] D a keldsen (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC) D. Keldsen 18:34, 12 February 2024 (UTC).Reply

References

Royal Prerogative edit

So you think that the Reynolds article was incorrect. What makes you think that? What rules are you citing? EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

accurately predicting gas prices? edit

highly unlikely and completely uncited. In any case its hardly relevant. Why would you revert an edit that removes just the word 'accurately'? And why revert the talk page asking the question?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dan McTeague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dan McTeague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Diesel Fuel Saturday March 5, 2022 edit

Why Diesel fuel went $0.13 this morning 65.95.48.221 (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply