Talk:Damnation Crusade

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Alternate covers? edit

any information on why thereis two different covers for the first issue ?

Alternate covers are used a lot, especially on first issues, as it gives a nice boost to sales making the numbers look a lot better. (Emperor 14:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC))Reply

What Now? edit

Apparently, this page is a "stub". What do we need to add to un-stub it? I never understood the whole thing about copyright on images, so anything like that will get deleted if I add it. Should we add the outline of the whole series as it gets released, or what? --D'Argent 18:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Simple answer is: Plot ;) . Don't bother splitting it up into issue #1, issue #2 kind of business but if someone fleshes out a decent plot section then that would tick my box for removing the stub tags. I don't think it needs anymore images unless there is something important that needs illustrating (a few panels are considered fair use as they are only a small part of a larger work but it needs to be fairly low resolution so the best thing is to aim for something round about the size you want it). I'd say go for the plot and it would be looking solid and more rounded. I might dig out some reviews if I can find them and drop them in too. (Emperor 18:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC))Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damnation Crusade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:42, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damnation Crusade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply