Talk:Daglish, Western Australia/GA1
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Trains2050 (talk · contribs) 10:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Greetings! I will be reviewing this article and suggest any changes to be made! I am going to use a template so it will be easy for you to see the progress. By the way I am going to make small changes such as grammar corrections, clarity and spelling corrections, this is to save all of us time however for general suggestions, I will leave them for you to change. If you want to revert my changes, please feel free to do so and let me know. Thanks Trains2050 (talk)
General suggestions
edit- Is the 2021 census data published? Or not yet, if it is published, please update the data. Thanks
- That is not published yet. I will come out mid this year. Steelkamp (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- In the education section, it does mention that its in the catchment area of Shenton college however Shenton College is a partaly selective school, is there any non selective high school that Daglish is in the catchment area for?
- When it says Shenton College is partially selective, it means that the school is selective for its GATE program, but not for students in general. There is no test or anything to get into that school for students living in the intake area, which includes Daglish. The first two paragraphs of Shenton College#Education should explain more. Steelkamp (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | looks great! Just see general suggestions |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | very good layout does not seem to contain any words to watch |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Seems good |
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | seems good |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | all backed up |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Good coverage |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | most pictures are own work |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Can you spread out the pictures more. |
|
7. Overall assessment. |
On hold until changes are made Trains2050 (talk) @Trains2050: I have removed an image so that there are no longer any adjacent images, and I've addressed your other comments. Steelkamp (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
|