Talk:Dagger-axe

Learn more about this page

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Needs a picture to be useful. Mathiastck 21:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I had a lovely photo, but I ended up not using it, because I was unsure of the legal status. See Wikipedia talk:Image use policy/copyright#Museum --Iustinus 00:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Change Name? edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this article be titled Ge, which is more in line with how this item is reference in historical study. Thoughts? Elijahmeeks 14:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Stone dagger edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Maybe supply approx. age and type of stone (?basalt) of dagger head — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.37.71 (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Chinese Fang ? edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Acc to this p5 and p23 it is also called Fang or Chinese fang. 89.201.185.4 (talk) 21:05, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic