Talk:Daemonologie
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daemonologie article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"REASONS for PERSECUTING a WITCH".?!
editI am Stunned how Anyone who has (presumably) received a First-World Education in preparation for life in the second decade of the 21st Century, could characterize "Daemonologie" as a laudable text:
"It was a political yet theological statement to EDUCATE a MISINFORMED populace on the history, practices and implications of sorcery and the REASONS for PERSECUTING a WITCH in a "Christian society" under the rule of canonical law."
It's a SCOUNDREL's Errand to claim the desire to "...Educate a MIS-Informed populace on the..."Reasons for Persecuting a 'WITCH' in a 'CHRISTIAN' Society..."
When the majority of that "populace" has been MIS-Informed and Manipulated for Generations by Slanderous, Pejorative Judeo-Xtian MYTHOLOGIES about "Witches" at the direction of a Paranoid Monarchs & its Subservient Clergy, >90% of the Blame for that 'Misinformation' Lays SQUARELY with Theocratic Monarchists.
There are N E V E R Justifiable 'Reasons' to employ IRRATIONAL LIES to PERSECUTE Fictionalized Minorities. 172.250.69.244 (talk) 12:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- That sentence was introduced in May 2016 by User:Mysticalresearch, who seems to be inactive now.
- You are right, that sentence is unacceptable. I replaced it by the pre-Mysticalresearch version. --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oh right. Please don't shout. We can hear you well if you write normally. --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)