Talk:DOT-111 tank car

Imploding?

Is this the type of tank car shown imploding here? Abductive (reasoning) 19:14, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Probably so because the event most likely occurred in North America. But implosion is a rare event because it requires volitionary external suction. Explosions occur more frequently. 66.185.212.81 (talk) 11:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

It's certainly not a North American car. It has European buffer-and-chain couplers which are never used in North America. The design may be similar but it's not clear how the construction standards compare.--agr (talk) 12:48, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

How long is it?

no basic information in one place — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.160.7.210 (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

DOT-111 is a set of construction standards (there are different DOT-xxx standards for various different kind of products, DOT-111 is basically for unpressurized flammable liquids), not a set of dimensions. DOT-111 tank cars come in several different sizes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.123.64 (talk) 22:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Redirects

The variant names should redirect there

• DOT111 / CTC111A & CTC 111A
• DOT 111 tank car & DOT111 tank car / CTC111A tank car & CTC 111A tank car
• CTC111A tanker car , CTC 111A tanker car , CTC-111A tanker car / CTC111A tanker , CTC 111A tanker , CTC-111A tanker
• DOT111 tanker car , DOT-111 tanker car , DOT 111 tanker car / DOT111 tanker , DOT-111 tanker , DOT 111 tanker
• CTC111A rail car , CTC 111A rail car , CTC-111A rail car / CTC111A railcar , CTC 111A railcar , CTC-111A railcar / CTC111A rail-car , CTC 111A rail-car , CTC-111A rail-car
• DOT111 rail car , DOT-111 rail car , DOT 111 rail car / DOT111 railcar , DOT-111 railcar , DOT 111 railcar / DOT111 rail-car , DOT-111 rail-car , DOT 111 rail-car
• CTC111A car , CTC 111A car , CTC-111A car
• DOT111 car , DOT-111 car , DOT 111 car

-- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please explain the distinction between DOT111 and DOT111A

"DOT-111A cars are equipped with AAR Type E top and bottom shelf Janney couplers...." I didn't see any introductory remarks explaining that. Thanks. 152.180.6.2 (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

The distinction is made clear at http://www.henrycoema.org/forms/RailRoad%20Tank%20Car%20Marking%20System.pdf, but I have a feeling I'll make a mess of things trying to edit the page. Whoever is editing this page is doing a good job, and I hope he adds this information. There are some typos in the .pdf to which I just linked, so maybe another page with the same information will be better.152.180.6.2 (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

There is no difference, the A is a delimiter and has no meaning except as a place holder to indicate the number after it is the pressure the car is tested to.

News

Here's an article for someone to use: • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

• Secrecy of Oil-by-Train Shipments Causes Concern Across the U.S.; The Wall Street Journal; May 22, 2014.

Lots of items like this(including items not behind paywalls) but this article is about the tank itself, not the movement of commodities.--Daffydavid (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Clean up

Article is is in need of clean up. Some items are in the wrong sections, others are way too wordy. I will try to do some when I have time but feel free to help out. Thanks. --Daffydavid (talk) 05:15, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

> I made some edits to clean up certain obvious errors and inconsistencies - more needs to be dome, will chip in as time permits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.216.34.234 (talk) 01:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

As of this typing (10:00 PM / Eastern US Timezone), the link citation at the end of the article for the NTSB PDF, "DOT-111 Tank Car Design" leads to a 404 page. That PDF does not appear to be archived anywhere obvious on Google, although I'll note my Google skills are rather lacking. If anyone out there has a PDF, maybe they could archive it somewhere responsible and update the link? I don't know that I can help further, but if you need to find me personally, I'm at laserhawk64@gmail.com 2600:6C60:5800:8472:3D23:47DF:85C5:C230 (talk) 02:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DOT-111 tank car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140811120401/http://ncsp.tamu.edu/reports/TSB/r96m0011.htm to http://ncsp.tamu.edu/reports/TSB/r96m0011.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DOT-111 tank car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20140315131924/http://missoulian.com/news/national/oil-mars-ala-swamp-months-after-crude-train-crash/article_b4e12d82-809a-5388-ba93-65b5218e7ae2.html to http://missoulian.com/news/national/oil-mars-ala-swamp-months-after-crude-train-crash/article_b4e12d82-809a-5388-ba93-65b5218e7ae2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

2023 Ohio train derailment

Maybe it should be mentioned in this article that numerous DOT-111 tank cars failed and lost their loads in the 2023 Ohio train derailment, whereas none of the newer-style DOT-105J tank cars carrying vinyl chloride were breached in the derailment. Source: testimony in this video of the second day of the NTSB hearing on the 2023 Ohio train derailment, starting at 6 hrs., 28 min. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-QON0Tel1Q 173.88.246.138 (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

DOT-105 tank car

Do we have a Wikipedia article about the DOT-105 tank car, which is generally regarded as superior to the DOT-111 design in terms of its durability? If not, why not, and can we correct this situation? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 16:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)