Talk:DC's Young Animal

Comics Mid‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.comicsbeat.com/exclusive-dcs-young-animal-winds-down-for-now-but-doom-patrol-will-return/

Requested move 9 May 2017 edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 05:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Young Animal (DC Comics) → Young Animal – Move and just use a hatnote. No need for a dab with two items. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

This proposal assumes that the DC imprint is the clear primary topic, which I'm not sure is the case. The manga publication has been around for a lot longer (and has a larger circulation). -Jason A. Quest (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose – This graph compares views for the article about the manga magazine (originally pink, blue since the article was renamed) and the article about the DC imprint (green). While the latter is higher, it isn't dramatically higher. And it's unclear which will have greater long-term significance. WP:2DABS says that in that case, the name they share should be a disambiguation page. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 14:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Oppose - the newer article is getting a little more traffic like Jason said, but I don't think it's enough to declare primary, especially since the new subject is less than a year old. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic