Talk:DAX (application)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Rexweiner1 in topic Request edit on 3 November 2015

COI edit

I've tagged this article for COI per the boxes above. The article needs to be reviewed by an independent editor for NPOV and sourcing; whoever does that, please leave a note there. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to have inadvertently made my revisions directly to this page following my COI declaration and in response to editor's criticisms. But I believe the version as it stands now conforms to the required style and would like to have it reviewed, thanks. Rexweiner1 (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Jytdog! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexweiner1 (talkcontribs) 16:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Any idea of when this piece might get reviewed? Would like to get busy revising all the other pieces that require my COI revision, but would like to be instructed by this experience first. Thanks!Rexweiner1 (talk) 22:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Your new version is definitely better: much more neutral in tone, but in my opinion still contains excessive mentions of products, which gives the article a bit of a promotional slant. But the current version is definitely an improvement. Altamel (talk) 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Altamel. What's the next step? Can you suggest edits? Eager to finish this up.Rexweiner1 (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexweiner1 (talkcontribs) 21:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Request edit on 3 November 2015 edit

Looking for editing suggestions on this entry, after several revisionsRexweiner1 (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply