Talk:Cyworld

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Websites: Computing

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

20 million way too low

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

20 million visitors a month is way too low. The 투멤 or member of the day alone will receive anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 visitors that day. Add that to the photo album of the day, clubs, the 11+ million members that check their Cyworld page at least once every few days - I would guess 200 million, not 20. Mithridates 15:29, 7 October 2005 (UTC) / ko:user:데이빛Reply

20 million /day

Yes, you're right. Based on the statistics of June 2005, Cyworld has 20 million visitors /day. See what I edited. -coolcooky

List of social networking websites on AfD

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

List of social networking websites is currently an AfD candidate. You are invited to partake in this discussion. Czj 18:46, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cyworld

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Cyworld is a horrible spammer. One could argue that someone is sending out spam in cyworld's name to tarnish it, but without evidence of such, cyworld deserves criticism.68.254.38.242 17:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proof and reports of this happening? -- Fuzheado | Talk 06:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

copyedit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

PaintedCarpet (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cyworld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic