Talk:Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2005/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


  • "Its best placing was fifth" to "Its best performance was a fifth-place finish"?
    • I tried it for a second, but calling it a performance in this type of article made it seem like I was talking about the "best performance" of a specific song, not performance in terms of success. Grk1011 (talk) 14:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "and the prior year" to "and the previous year" maybe
  • "broadcaster has used internal selections" to "broadcaster had used internal selections"
  • "For this year" to "In 2004"
  • "Christoforou previously represented" had
  • With word of Christoforou's selection Alongside
  • "broadcast on RIK 1, RIK Sat as well as online via cybc.cy" to "broadcast on RIK 1 and RIK Sat, as well as online via cybc.cy"
  • "contained English translation" to "contained an English translation of the show"
  • "Sokratis Soumelas (EMI Greece)" EMI Greece is his company, not a profession like you've included for the others
  • "points from 1–8, 10 and 12 to the" to "1–8, 10, or 12 points to the"
  • "both evenings of the contest" to "both rounds of the contest"
  • Refs seem generally reliable; will spot-check later.
  • Images are fine. AryKun (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

@AryKun: I've taken a look at your initial comments and made some changes! Grk1011 (talk) 14:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, did some spot-checks, will pass now. AryKun (talk) 06:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply