Talk:Cyprinidae

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Jts1882 in topic Classification

Where does it live?

edit

This article needs to address where roaches live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris141496 (talkcontribs) 15:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC) It should be addressed in its own article since it is about the whole family, not roaches.SuperPayara123 (talk) 01:49, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

I love pictures. But not grouping them make the article really long. Ebaychatter0 (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Systematics

edit

Where did you find the information that Labeobarbus should be included in the subfamily Labeoninae? Note: Labeobarbus is different from Labiobarbus. 134.245.146.38 (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Timeline

edit

I removed this timeline from the article, as it does not seem to be providing any actual useful information… The below is an actual cut/paste from the article, with no changes on my part. --VikÞor | Talk 18:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Timeline

edit
QuaternaryNeogenePaleogeneHolocenePleist.Plio.MioceneOligoceneEocenePaleoceneBramaQuaternaryNeogenePaleogeneHolocenePleist.Plio.MioceneOligoceneEocenePaleocene
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cyprinidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Classification

edit

Note to editors. Wikiproject:Fishes currently follows the 5th edition of Fishes of the World for classification above the level of genus. If you are going to input a newer classification, as I understand the consensus, these should be presented as an alternative to that in Fishes of the World, 5th edition, until such time as consensus is reached on a new authority. Quetzal1964 (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article is rather confusing at the moment. I think it might be helpful to have a simple listing of subfamilies and the alternative classifications where some are raised to families (Betancur/Deeepfin) or split with Leuciscidae (van der Laan 2017). The more detailed listings could follow or been moved to other articles. A basic table is below and could be extended with tribes and some explanation of what is moved where. There are also subfamilies recognised in Fishbase (e.g. Alburninae).   Jts1882 | talk  09:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
FotW5 Betancur/Deepfin van der Laan 2017
Order Cypriniformes — carps, loaches, minnows, and relatives

Order Cypriniformes — carps, loaches, minnows, and relatives

Order Cypriniformes — carps, loaches, minnows, and relatives