Talk:Cyclosa argenteoalba
 | Cyclosa argenteoalba was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 4, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 September 2020 and 17 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mlschoening.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Behavioral Ecology Peer Review edit
I thought the article was well-written and well-cited. I think the structure is really great as well. I added some information in the Webs and Life Cycle and Reproduction Sections. M.s.w.lee (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
This article is off to a good start. I added a section for Population structure, and I think some additional information regarding speciation would be beneficial - I started this section off with a brief discussion of close relatives. I added some information on web relocation. Cjing99 (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
This is well-written article that requires some minor changes. I went through and made a series of grammatical errors. I also changed some of the sentence structures to make more sense. I added a 'Courtship and Copulation" section as well as a "Coloring and Predation" heading rather than letting it be a subsection of diet. I think that expanding on the habitats of these spiders would be helpful. Kekaze (talk) 08:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclosa argenteoalba/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MeegsC (talk · contribs) 10:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this one. It may take me a few days to post my first comments. MeegsC (talk) 10:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
As this appears to be a class project, I'll post a few initial comments to see if the nominating editor is still participating:
- All measurements should be in imperial as well as metric units. The {{convert}} template is a great one to use here. Ping me if you're not sure how to use it.
- Section headings should only have the first word capitalized: for example "Predation and coloring" rather than "Predation and Coloring".
- Fully spell out the genus name anywhere that it starts a sentence: e.g. "Cyclosa argenteoalba are characterized..." rather than "C. argenteoalba are characterized..."
- Drosophila should be italicized and capitalized, since it's a genus name.
Once I get a response indicating that the editor is watching this, I'll continue my review. MeegsC (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Given that there has been no response from the nominator in more than a week (and that the nominator has not edited since their class ended in December), I am assuming they are no longer interested in progressing this GA nomination. Therefore, I'm closing this review. The article is close to GA status, but will need some work—mostly MOS issues, copyediting, and reduction/explanation of jargon—in order to pass. I'm happy to review again in the future if someone decides to follow up. MeegsC (talk) 13:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)