Talk:Cyclone Graham

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Juliancolton in topic GA Review
Good articleCyclone Graham has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 12, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Cyclone Graham dropped 163 millimetres (6.4 in) of rain at Telfer, Australia in one night, over half the community's annual average?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Graham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • All references need publisher information.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Just one issue with the references that needs to be addressed before the article is promoted to GA status, so I am putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with this concern. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done. The references in question had the publisher as their author, so I switched it around. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks (my third GA today!) :-) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply