Talk:Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita.
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110014709/http://www.dermis.net/dermisroot/en/42766/diagnose.htm to http://www.dermis.net/dermisroot/en/42766/diagnose.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080403214748/http://www.peacehealth.org/kbase/nord/nord1000.htm to http://www.peacehealth.org/kbase/nord/nord1000.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
icd
editUser:Tattycakes per you email have indicated ICD per [1]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
I find this article to be weirdly written and have several problems
editI'll collect them as separate comments/topics here, but looking at the edit history there will probably become an edit war if any of the things are changed 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- First problem: "For a full and up-to-date description visit the CMTC webpages [...]". Why? Is the definition updated every 5 minutes or why would it be so hard just using the site as a reference instead? 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- related: Is there *really* no .com or .co.uk or .org site that is equally good? Why a Netherlands domain? And why the insistance to make it a part of the main text? 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Second problem: why have a genetics chart AND a cause section that says that "cases appear sporadically" and "Hypothesises include". Either we know that it's genetic (with possible mutations as a cause), or the cause it's unknown or unconfirmed (and it that case the image should br removed) 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Third problem: "People with visible marks generally feel fine (physically) and can act normally, but when it is mentioned, they may become withdrawn and self-conscious."
- wow, what a delightfully unhelpful way to describe "yeah it can be hard to look different sometimes" and try to make a completely normal reaction sound like a symptom 178.174.193.250 (talk) 06:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)