This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Overall this looks good. It appears to be well-sourced, complete in coverage, and neutral in tone. My main concerns are with clearing up a few sentences and giving sufficient context for non-viewers of the show.
"accidentally outs" -- rather informal; also, it implies that they're gay. Some more context would definitely be helpful here.
"Shareholder Meeting" featuring "Recyclops" -- what does this mean? Is Recyclops the name of another episode?
"largely positive review" -- occurs two sentences in a row, consider tweaking to avoid the repetition.
"showed the stakes behind its characters’ […] in a way it hasn’t since Michael Scott left Scranton." -- this quotation doesn't work grammatically with that apostrophe still in place. Why not just give the full quotation? It's only two words more.
"but noted that Krasinksi" -- why "but" here? This doesn't seem to contradict the previous part of the sentence. Also, consider rephrasing "noted" per WP:WTA.
"cold opening" -- this phrase comes up several times. Isn't properly "cold open"?
Context should be given for the fact that the show is a fake documentary, to explain to readers unfamiliar with it what's going on with Brian.
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
