Talk:Current loop

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two-way radio use - proposal to delete edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This section seems to be about historical and proprietary equipment, far removed from the process control mainstream use. I propose deleting this to prevent confusion. Dougsim (talk) 18:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Process control instrumentation is no more contemporary than its use for remote radio station control. It's near-obsolete for everything now, including instrumentation. So this should stay. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:37, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

4-20mA current loop is still in wide use. Dougsim (talk) 21:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Many things are both obsolete, yet still in use as legacies. Current loop (a single low-bandwidth signal per copper wire!) is hardly the choice for new work. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

4-20mA is not legacy. This manufacturer guidance note is dated 2015 [1] Dougsim (talk) 02:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic