Talk:Currency House

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Contested deletion edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it isn't advertising, or at least can't be improved easily enough through editing. The group are notable, and the essays from the quarterly journal seem to be well covered in the media, and in at least one case are the subject of journal articles themselves. --Bilby (talk) 14:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

To be honest, in re-reading it, I'm not sure why it would be considered overly promotional - it is descriptive, but I'm not aware that I used any promotional language in the article. I'm curious as to how best to improve it in that regard. - Bilby (talk) 14:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
After a quick review of potential sources, I agree with Bilby; this appears to be a legitimate arts organization. A November 2011 article in The Australian describes it as the "arts advocacy organisation, Currency House, which publishes an influential quarterly essay series, Platform Papers)."[1]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Currency House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply