Talk:Cumwhinton

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Laplacemat in topic CCHT external link
edit

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 11:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Historic station template

edit

I've reinstated the historic station template, deleted some time ago, as it is a link in a chain along the line. Taking it out broke the chain. I created new railway section to make the material less intrusive in an article that is (as a previous editor said) about a village, not a station. Maybe we need a different picture at the top and then move the train picture into the railway section. --Northernhenge (talk) 21:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cumwhinton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply