Talk:Culoz
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Errors
editThe following comments were placed in the article by 80.9.37.247:
1. Culoz is not Curtafond, fairly obviously!
2.1 The arrondisement is WRONG. 2.2 The canton is WRONG. 2.3 The postal code is WRONG.
3.1 To give office dates for an unnamed mayor is bizarre. 3.2 To give footnotes for population and land area, when none are given is bizarre.
The page has every appearance of being GiGo generated from a computer file. Yes I could correct it, but each of nearly 100 departments has typically several hundred communes, and one must suspect the GiGo problem is sytematic.
I'm sure I'll be howled down for vandalism, but really this page (?these pages) ought not to exist, should it? (And a warning is more constructive than ignoring it!)
Moved here by Adrian M. H. 01:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Culoz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015040/http://joan-of-arc-studies.org/index.php?Gazetteer-Culoz to http://joan-of-arc-studies.org/index.php?Gazetteer-Culoz
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)